Pandiyaraja Ammal v. M.Uma Maheswari
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought withdrawal of a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings, which was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 16.02.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
CRL.O.P.(MD)No.11362 of 2014 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014
1.Pandiyaraja Ammal 2.Sankarapandian
3.Nirmala Devi
4.Umasankar ...Petitioners/Respondents 1 to 4
-Vs-
M.Uma Maheswari ...Respondent/Petitioner
PRAYER : Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in Cr.M.P.No.7854 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakkanur and quash the same.
For Petitioners : Mr.H.Velavadhas
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
To
The Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakkanur.
CRL.O.P.(MD)No.11362 of 2014 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 16.02.2018
das MKV-CM-SAR 2/21.2.2018/2P-3C
1.Pandiyaraja Ammal, 2.Sankarapandian, 3.Nirmala Devi, 4.Umasankar
M.Uma Maheswari
P.Rajamanickam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court