Disposed

V. Pandiarajan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Feb 2018CRL OP(MD)/2153/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition, the petitioner sought direction to register a case regarding an alleged conspiracy and refusal to repay money. The court directed the police to expedite the enquiry and register a case if the enquiry reveals a cognizable offence.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to expedite the enquiry and register a case if a cognizable offence is revealed.

V. Pandiarajan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 16.02.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.2153 of 2018

V.Pandiarajan

... Petitioner

-Vs-

The Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station, Chinnamanur, Theni District.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondent to register the case on the basis of the complaint received in C.S.R.No.65 of 2018, dated 23.01.2018.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Ramesh Kumar

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.Prabu Ramachandran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, to direct the third respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner, dated 23.01.2018.

¶17

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the proposed accused and his wife hatched conspiracy and obtained a sum of Rs.5 lakhs from the petitioner's wife and thereafter, they refused to repay the said amount and hence, the petitioner has lodged a complaint before the respondent on 23.01.2018, but so far, no action has been taken.

¶18

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) has submitted that after receipt of the said complaint, C.S.R.No.65 of 2018 has been issued and the said complaint is pending for enquiry.

¶19

4.Recording the aforesaid submissions, the respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and if the enquiry reveals any https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ cognizable offence, then he has to register a case and proceed further in accordance with law.

¶20

¶21

5.with the above said observations, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

1.The Inspector of Police, Chinnamanur Police Station, Chinnamanur, Theni District.

¶27

The Additional public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶28

1 cc TO Mr.D.Ramesh Kumar , Advocate in SR No. 49262 Ia

¶29

AE/SV MMS/SAR4/26.02.2018/2P/4C

¶30

CRL.O.P.(MD)No.2153 of 2018 16.02.2018

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V. Pandiarajan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Pandiarajan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.M.Duraisamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

M.a.Raju Vs the Superintendent of Police

A.Anwar Basha, Vs the Superintendent of Police

Pandiyaraja Ammal Vs M.Uma Maheswari

S.Karunanithi Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Senthamarai Kannan, Vs the Inspector of Police