Disposed

G.Ezhilil Barathi v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC3 Oct 2018CRL OP(MD)/11861/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought transfer of investigation and periodical reports. Court dismissed petition as infructuous because investigation was transferred. Inspector of Police directed to complete investigation and file final report within three months.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; Inspector of Police, Vedachandur directed to complete investigation and file final report within three months.

G.Ezhilil Barathi Vs the Superintendent of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 03.10.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11861 of 2014

¶7

G.Ezhilil Barathi

¶8

:Petitioner/Defacto Complainant

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul City. (Crime No.25/2014) ..Respondents/Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 1^st respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.25 of 2014 pending on the file of the 2^nd respondent to some other agencies and to furnish periodical reports to this Hon'ble Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.C.M.Arumugam For Respondents : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Charima Prabhu

¶14

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This petition is filed to direct the 1^st respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.25 of 2014 pending on the file of the 2^nd respondent to some other agencies and to furnish periodical reports.

¶17

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that the case in Crime No.25 of 2014 has been transferred to the Inspector of Police, Vedachandur Police Station, Dindigul District. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.Recording the same, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, considering the year of the

¶19

¶20

crime, the Inspector of Police, Vedachandur Police Station, Dindigul District is directed to complete the investigation and file the final report within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar (Protocol)

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-I)

¶25

¶26

1.	The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.	The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul City.
3.	The Inspector of Police, Vedachandura Police Station, Dindigul District.
4.	The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+ 1	CC TO Mr.C.M.ARUMUGAM, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 89023
MSA TE/	SV/SAR-1 : 01/11/2018 : 2P/6C
	Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11861 of 2014 03.10.2018

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Ezhilil Barathi v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Ezhilil Barathi v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Dhayabaran Vs K.Sethu Sundaram Pillai

S. Meenakshi Sundaram, Vs Senthil Ramesh

Baby Rani Vs the Insepctor of Police

Dr. Lubna Akbar Vs the Inspector of Police

Saravanan @ Ramalingam Vs the Inspector of Police

Manoj Vs the Deputy Superintendent of