Dismissed

S. Meenakshi Sundaram, v. Senthil Ramesh

Madras HC1 Oct 2018CRL OP(MD)/11338/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. Personal appearance of the petitioner in the underlying trial court is dispensed with except for specific hearing dates.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; personal appearance in lower court dispensed with except for specific hearing dates.

S. Meenakshi Sundaram, Vs Senthil Ramesh — Madras HC (2018) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.10.2018 CORAM:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶4

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11338 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 2 of 2014

¶5

S.Meenakshi Sundaram .. Petitioner/Accused

¶6

Vs.

¶7

Senthil Ramesh .. Respondent/Complainant

¶8

PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings in S.T.C.No.70 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I/Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Madurai and to quash the same.

¶9

For Petitioner: Mr.M.R.Sreenivasan For Respondent: Mr.J.Gunaseelan Muthiah

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶12

2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this criminal original petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the personal appearance of the petitioner before the Court below may be dispensed with. Accordingly, the personal appearance of the petitioner in S.T.C.No.70/2014 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I/Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Madurai is dispensed with, except the dates of hearing, on which, the learned Judicial Magistrate insisted upon the petitioner to appear before the Court.

¶13

Assistant Registrar (P&A)

¶14

// True Copy //

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

¶17

¶18

The Judicial Magistrate No.I/Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Madurai.

¶19

- 1 CC TO MR.M.R.SREENIVASAN, ADVOCATE IN SR NO.88337

¶20

¶21

BU/SKN/SAR-I :29.10.2018 : 2P/3C

¶22

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11338 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 01.10.2018

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Meenakshi Sundaram, v. Senthil Ramesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Meenakshi Sundaram, v. Senthil Ramesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Palani Vs the Inspector of Police

Tamilselvan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

M.Mangaleswaran Vs K.R.Muthukumaran

C.Dhayabaran Vs K.Sethu Sundaram Pillai

Baby Rani Vs the Insepctor of Police

Ramalingam Vs the Inspector of Police