Dismissed

Baby Rani v. the Insepctor of Police

Madras HC1 Oct 2018CRL OP(MD)/11466/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal original petition filed to quash an FIR, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the petition because the government advocate submitted that the investigation was nearly complete and a final report would be filed soon, rendering the prayer infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The request to quash the FIR was dismissed; however, the investigation agency was directed to file a final report within three months.

Baby Rani Vs the Insepctor of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 01.10.2018

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11466 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014

¶7

Baby Rani

¶8

...Petitioner/

¶9

Accused Rank Not Known

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar West Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

¶12

(Crime No.301 of 2013) ...1^st Respondent/Complainant

¶13

2.G.S.S.Latha

¶14

...2^nd Respondent/Defacto

¶15

Complainant

¶16

PRAYER : This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the First Information Report pertaining to the case in Crime No.301 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same.

¶17

For Petitioners: Mr.S.Ramasamy

¶18

For R1 : Mr.A.P.G.Ohm Chairma Prabhu Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.S.Vanchinathan

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The petition is filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.301 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent police.

¶21

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the investigation is almost over and a final report will be filed within three months.

¶22

3.Recording the said submission made by the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Government Advocate (Crl.side), since the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous, the Criminal Original

¶23

¶24

Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed. However, the first respondent is directed to file a final report within a period three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy //

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶27

¶28

1.The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar West Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

¶29

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

1 CC TO MR.S.RAMASAMY, ADVOCATE IN SR NO.88130

¶31

RMK

¶32

BU/PM/SAR-III :31.10.2018 : 2P/4C

¶33

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.11466 of 2014 01.10.2018

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Baby Rani v. the Insepctor of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baby Rani v. the Insepctor of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Palani Vs the Inspector of Police

Tamilselvan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

M.Mangaleswaran Vs K.R.Muthukumaran

C.Dhayabaran Vs K.Sethu Sundaram Pillai

S. Meenakshi Sundaram, Vs Senthil Ramesh

Ramalingam Vs the Inspector of Police