Partly allowed

A.Veerappan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/1559/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition challenged conditions of bail imposed on accused petitioners. The court modified the appearance condition, requiring monthly visits to the Magistrate Court on the first working day of every month.

What did the court decide?

The previously imposed condition was modified to require monthly appearance at the Magistrate Court on the first working day of every month at 10.00 p.m.

A.Veerappan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Seventh day of March Two Thousand and Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.1559 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.17310 of 2017

¶6

1 A.VEERAPPAN

¶7

2 ANNAMALAI

¶8

... Petitioners/Accused No.3 and 4

¶9

¶10

THE STATE REP. BY

¶11

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOMANATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, SOMANATHAPURAM, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶12

... Respondent/Complainant

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditions imposed on the petitioners in order dated29.01.2018 in Crl.MP(MD)No. 573/2017 in Crl.OP(MD)No. 17320/2017.

¶14

Order: This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.PRABHU, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶15

This Petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.M.P(MD).No.573 of 2017 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17310 of 2017, dated 29.01.2018.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶18

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioners are complying with the condition regularly and further submitted that charge sheet has not been filed.

¶19

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), the condition already imposed on the petitioners is modified to the extent that the petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate Court, monthly once, i.e., the first working day of every English Calendar month at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

¶20

sd/07/03/2018

¶21

/ TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARAIKUDI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶25

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICAL, MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOMANATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, SOMANATHAPURAM, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶27

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.1559 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.17310 of 2017 Date :07/03/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

SDS/MM-PN/SAR.4/14.03.2018/2P/5C

A.Veerappan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Veerappan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Premalatha Vs the Inspector of Police

Periyasami, Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan @ Yamaha Murugan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Shivanantham, Vs the Inspector of Police

Balu Vs the Inspector of Police

Sangili Vs the Inspector of Police