Disposed

S. Premalatha v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Mar 2018CRL MP(MD)/1580/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order in a criminal bail matter where the petitioner sought relaxation of existing bail conditions. The court Modified the conditions requiring the petitioner to appear before the concerned court once a month on the first working day at 10.30 a.m.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed in the earlier order is modified to require the petitioner to appear before the Court concerned once a month on the first working day at 10.30 a.m.

S. Premalatha Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Sixth day of March Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.1580 of 2018 IN CRL OP(MD) No.343 of 2018

¶6

S. PREMALATHA ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1

¶7

¶8

THE STATE THROUGH

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKKOTTAI POLICE STATION, NILAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT

¶10

IN CRIME NO. 366/2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court in the above Crl.MP(MD)No. 1142/2018 in Crl.OP(MD)No. 343/2018 dated 16.02.2018 in connection with the Cr.No. 366/2017 on the file of the respondent police

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. M. AASHA, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.(MD).No.1142 of 2018 in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.343 of 2018, dated 16.02.2018.

¶14

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner is abiding the condition

¶16

from 13.01.2018 without any deviation. Further he added that the investigation is not yet completed.

¶17

Considering the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioner is abiding the condition without any deviation and the investigation is not yet completed, hence, the earlier condition imposed on the petitioner is modified to the extent that the petitioner shall appear before the Court concerned, once in a month, i.e., on first working day of every month, at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶18

Accordingly, this petition is ordered.

¶19

sd/-

¶20

06/03/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

PJL

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NILAKKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT

¶25

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,DINDIGUL DISTRICT

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT

¶27

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶28

+1. C.C. to M/S. M. AASHA Advocate SR.No.3552

¶29

GJM/CSL/SAR-3-9.3.18-2P-6C

¶30

ORDER

¶31

IN CRL MP(MD) No.1580 of 2018 IN

¶32

CRL OP(MD) No.343 of 2018 Date :06/03/2018

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Premalatha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Premalatha v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subbaiah @ Vijay, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ravisankar Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugavel, Vs the Inspector of Police

Periyasami, Vs the Inspector of Police

Murugan @ Yamaha Murugan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Habeeb Rahman Vs the Inspector of Police