Allowed

Ramesh Kumar Jain, Aged 55 v. Mr.Suresh Kumar Goud

Madras HC19 Nov 2018CRL MP/5588/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application by a person sentenced for cheque dishonour, the Madras High Court suspended the sentence on condition that the petitioner deposits 50% of the cheque amount within three weeks, to be tracked to the lower court.

What did the court decide?

Sentence suspended on condition of depositing 50% of cheque amount within three weeks; case listed for hearing after four weeks.

Ramesh Kumar Jain, Aged 55 Vs Mr.Suresh Kumar Goud — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Nineteenth day of November Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. PARTHIBAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.5588 of 2018

¶7

IN CRL RC.462/2018

¶8

RAMESH KUMAR JAIN [ PETITIONER ]

¶9

MR.SURESH KUMAR GOUD [ RESPONDENT ]

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to execution of the sentence passed against the petitioner in C.C.No.3844/2009 the Judgement dated 22/09/2017 passed by the Honble Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai-600 003 and confirmed in C.A.No.315 of 2017 by the Honble XV Additional Sessions Court, Chennai be suspended and the petitioner to be released on bail, pending disposal of the above appeal Crl.R.C.No.462 of 2018.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.ARVIND KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner the court made the following order:-

¶12

The sentence passed against the petitioner in C.C.No.3844/2009 dated 22.09.2017, by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court1, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai 600 003, be suspended on condition that the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the cheque amount in respect of the Revision Petition, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order to the credit of the above said lower Court.

¶13

2. Post the Criminal Revision Petition for hearing after four weeks.

¶14

-sd/19/11/2018

¶15

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶16

TRUE COPY

¶17

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, FAST TRACK COURT-1, EGMORE AT ALLIKULAM, CHENNAI. 2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE XV ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, CHENNAI. +2C.C. to M/S.M.ARVIND KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges in SR.NO. 21808 Order in CRL MP.5588/2018 in CRL RC.462/2018 Date :19/11/2018 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format MLT-27/11/2018

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ramesh Kumar Jain, Aged 55 v. Mr.Suresh Kumar Goud

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar Jain, Aged 55 v. Mr.Suresh Kumar Goud

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.K.S.Lathamani, Vs the Chairman

J.F.R. Victor, Vs M.R. Muthannan, Proprietor

V.Vinoth Vs Iop Oomerabad Ps

Vijayakumar, Aged 43 Years, Vs State Rep. by

Sailesh, M/a 42 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

Ramesh Kumar Jain, Aged 55 Yrs Vs Mr.Suresh Kumar Goud