No representation was filed by the petitioner for hearing. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition for non-prosecution and closed the connected Miscellaneous Petition.
Criminal Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 16.11.2018
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC E V.PARTHIBAN
Crl.R.C.No.954 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.No.7499 of 2016
J.F.R.Victor ... Petitioner Vs. M.R.Muthannan ...Respondent Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 read with 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside the conviction and sentence passed against the Revision Petitioner/Accused on 10.03.2015 in C.C.No. 215 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1 at Salem which was confirmed by the Appellate Court on 10.06.2016 in Crl.A.No.56 of 2015 on the file of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Salem and acquit him from the charge against him.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Suresh ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing on 13.11.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the matter was adjourned to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 16.11.2018 i.e., today.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
dna
To
Crl.R.C.No.954 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.No.7499 of 2016
CNR(CO) GMY(12/12/2018)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
J.F.R.Victor
M.R.Muthannan
E V.PARTHIBAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
