Dismissed

Sailesh, M/a 42 Years, v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC19 Nov 2018CRL MP/12337/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

These miscellaneous petitions challenged the suspension of a sentence imposed for sexual misbehaviour with the petitioner's daughter. The court, considering the gravity of the offence and the prosecution's submission, dismissed the petitions and denied the requested bail and exemption.

What did the court decide?

Petitions were dismissed; sentence was not suspended; exemption from surrender was denied.

Sailesh, M/a 42 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Nineteenth day of November Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. PARTHIBAN

¶6

Crl.M.P.Nos.12337, 12340, 12339 and 12342 of 2018 in Crl.RC.Nos.1058 & 1059 of 2018

¶7

SAILESH [ PETITIONER / APPELLANT / ACCUSED IN ALL THE PETITIONS ]

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REP BY ITS, [ RESPONDENT THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IN CRL.MP.NO.12337 & 12339 OF 2018 W-10 ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, IN CRL.RC.NO.1058 OF 2018 KOTHAWALCHAVADI, AND 2^nd RESPONDENT IN CRL.MP.NOS.12340 CHENNAI-1 & 12342 OF 2018 IN CRL.RC.NO.1059/2018]

¶10

SADHANA 1^st RESPONDENT / APPELLANT / DEFACTO – COMPLAINANT IN CRL.MP.NOS.12340 & 12342 OF 2018 IN CRL.RC.NO.1059 OF 2018 ]

¶11

Petitions praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.RC.Nos.1058 & 1059 of 2018 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to

¶12

[i] suspend the sentence passed by the Learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town Chennai in C.C.No.1873 of 2012 by its order dated 22.06.2017 which was confirmed by the Learned XVII Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai passed in C.A.No.168 & 231 OF 2017 by its order dated 07.09.2018 and release the petitioner on bail pending the above Crl.RC.Nos.1058 & 1059 of 2018 [IN CRL.MP.NOS.12337 & 12340 OF 2018]

¶13

[ii] grant exemption to the petitioner from surrendering before the trial court in pursuance to judgment dated 07.09.2018 made in C.A.No.168 & 231 of 2017 on the file of the Learned XVII Additional Sessions Court at Chennai which confirmed the conviction imposed imposed on the petitioner in the judgment made in C.C.No.1873 of 2012 dated 22.06.2017 on the file of the Learned III Metropolitan Magistrate George Town, Chennai in Crl.RC.Nos.1058 & 1059 of 2018 [IN CRL.MP.NOS.12337 & 12342 OF 2018]

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.RC.Nos.1058 & 1059 of 2018 on the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.J.SURESH, Advocate for the petitioner [IN ALL THE PETITIONS] and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the [ Respondent in MP.12337 & 12339 OF 2018 IN CRL.RC.NO.1058/2018 & 2^nd Respondent in CRL.MP.NOS.12340 & 12342 OF 2018 IN CRL.RC.NO.1059 OF 2018], the court made the following order:-

¶16

Crl.M.P.Nos.12337, 12340 of 2018, have been filed to suspend the sentence passed by the learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai in C.C.No.1873 of 2012 by its order dated 22.06.2017.

¶17

2. Heard both sides.

¶18

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the evidence of P.W.1 and P.W.2 reveals that the victim girl is a daughter of the petitioner/accused and he had sexually misbehaved with her on various occasions. Therefore, he prayed for dismissal of these miscellaneous petitions.

¶19

4. Considering the gravity of the offence and the submissions of the Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for in Crl.M.P.Nos.12337 and 12340 of 2018 and the same are dismissed.

¶20

5. In view of the miscellaneous petitions in Crl.M.P.Nos.12337 and 12340 of 2018, being dismissed, the petitions in Crl.M.P.Nos.12339 and 12342 of 2018, for granting exemption to the petitioner from surrendering before the Trial Court in pursuance of the judgment dated 07.09.2018, on the file of the learned XVII Additional Sessions Court at Chennai, are also dismissed accordingly.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

19/11/2018

¶23

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶24

TRUE COPY

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

TO
1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
NO.IIi, GEORGE TOWN, CHENNAI.
2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
EGMORE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE XVII ADDITIONAL SESSIONS
COURT, CHENNAI.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
W-10 ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,
KOTHAWALCHAVADI CHENNAI-1
+2C.C. to M/S.J.SURESH Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR NO.22067, 22068
Order
in
Crl.M.P.Nos.12337, 12340,
12339 and 12342 of 2018
in
Crl.RC.Nos.1058 & 1059 of 2018
Date :19/11/2018
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
MK:30/11/2018

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sailesh, M/a 42 Years, v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sailesh, M/a 42 Years, v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.K.S.Lathamani, Vs the Chairman

J.F.R. Victor, Vs M.R. Muthannan, Proprietor

V.Vinoth Vs Iop Oomerabad Ps

Vijayakumar, Aged 43 Years, Vs State Rep. by

Ramesh Kumar Jain, Aged 55 Vs Mr.Suresh Kumar Goud

Ramesh Kumar Jain, Aged 55 Yrs Vs Mr.Suresh Kumar Goud