K.Balan, S/O.Karuppa Pillai, v. Mr.Rengarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court disposed of a contempt petition filed for non-compliance with a retirement benefit settlement order. The contemnors undertook to calculate and pay the dues within two months, leading to the closure of the petition with liberty to revive in case of default.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition in case of non-compliance by the respondents within the stipulated time.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Contempt Petition (MD)No.701 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.20295 of 2015
K.Balan ..Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.Rengarajan,
The Managing Director Tamil Nadu state Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd. Kumbakonam.
2.Mr.Arumugam,
The Administrator Tamil Nadu state Transport
Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-02. .. Contemnors/Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to commit and punish respondents for willful disobedience of the order in W.P.(MD)No.20295 of 2015.
Whether the petitioners terminal benefits including Pay Revision Arrears and commutation have been settled.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Balan
- respondent
Mr. Rengarajan
- respondent
Mr. Arumugam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court