P.Pandian,S/O.Ponnaiah, v. Mr.R.Muthukrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the petitioner claimed non-payment of interest on terminal benefits including gratuity and pension commutation. The court recorded submissions that the contemnors would calculate and pay the dues within two months, closing the petition with liberty to revive in case of non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive it in case of non-compliance with the undertaking to pay dues within two months.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 01.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Contempt Petition No.1250 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.22065 of 2015
P.Pandian .. Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
- R.Muthukrishnan, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Madurai) Ltd., Madurai.
- Arumugam, Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. .. Contemnors/Respondents
PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to commit and punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.22065 of 2015 dated 10.12.2015.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents had willfully disobeyed the earlier order directing payment of terminal benefits and interest.
Whether the contempt petitioners claim for interest on gratuity, commutation of pension, and leave salary is valid.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Pandian
- respondent
R. Muthukrishnan
- respondent
Arumugam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court