S.Palsamy v. Mr.K.Chellamuthu
Case brief
What is this about?
This Court closed a contempt petition filed for wilful disobedience of an order in a writ petition regarding pension and salary revision. The contemnors undertook to calculate and pay the due amount within two months.
What did the court decide?
Contemnors directed to pay any difference due within two months with liberty to revive petition if not complied.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 07.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Contempt Petition No.1472 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.20772 of 2015
S.Palsamy ..Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.K.Chellamuthu General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Pudukottai Region, Pudukottai.
2.Muniappan
Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Tiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. (R2 amended as per order dated 04.12.2017 in Sub.A(MD)No.258/2017 in cont.p(md)1472/2016.)
.. Respondents/Contemnors
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Palsamy
- respondent
K. Chellamuthu
- respondent
Muniappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court