Disposed

M.Mariappan, Special Grade v. Mr.R.Muthukrishnan

Madras HC1 Feb 2018CONT P(MD)/1234/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed for willful disobedience of a retirement benefits order. The court accepted the respondents' undertaking to pay dues within two months and instructed the file to be closed with liberty to revive the petition in case of default.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed with liberty to revive in case of non-compliance of the undertaking by respondents to pay dues within two months.

M.Mariappan, Special Grade Vs Mr.R.Muthukrishnan — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.02.2018

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Contempt Petition No.1234 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.20996 of 2015

¶5

M.Mariappan ..Petitioner/Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.Mr.R.Muthukrishnan,

¶8

The Managing Director,

¶9

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Madurai) Ltd., Madurai.

¶10

Mr.Arumugam,

¶11

The Administrator,

¶12

The Tamil Nadu State Transport

¶13

Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. .. Contemnors/Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to commit and punish the respondents for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.20996 of 2015 dated 26.11.2015.

¶15

Prayer in WP(MD)No.20996/2015;-

¶16

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the retirement benefits of the petitioner including Gratuity, Provident Fund, the Commuted Value of Pension, Leave Salary, Social Security Scheme arrears with enhanced dearness allowance at the rate of 113% in terms of G.O.No.121 Finance (Allowances) Department, dated 22.04.2015 together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of his retirement to till date of settlement within the time that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul

¶18

For R-1 : Mr.A.Jeyaram For R-2 : Mr.A.P.Muthupandian

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The contempt petition has been filed to commit and punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order passed by https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ this Court in W.P.(MD)No.20996 of 2015, dated 26.11.2015.

¶21

¶22

Heard Mr.A.Rahul, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.A.Jeyaram, learned counsel for the first contemnor and Mr.A.P.Muthupandian, learned counsel for the second contemnor.

¶23

The learned counsel for the contemnors on instructions would submit that the amount due and payable if any shall be calculated and paid to the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case of noncompliance, the petitioner can revive the contempt petition.

¶24

Recording the above submission, this contempt petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition in case of non-compliance. No costs.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶27

/True Copy/

¶28

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶29

+One cc to M/s.A.Rahul, Advocate, SR.No.45823

¶30

¶31

RL/2C/2P/SKN/RSK/SAR1/23/2/2018

¶32

Contempt Petition No.1234 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.20996 of 2015

¶33

01.02.2018

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Mariappan, Special Grade v. Mr.R.Muthukrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Mariappan, Special Grade v. Mr.R.Muthukrishnan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Rajendran Vs D.S.Vincent

K.Karunanithi Vs Rengarajan

S.Rani, W/O.Sabapathy Vs Thiru Gaagan Deep Singh Bedi

M.Perumal Vs Mr.Muthukrishnan

P.Pandian,S/O.Ponnaiah, Vs Mr.R.Muthukrishnan

G.Meenakshi, Vs Mr.Rengarajan