G.Meenakshi, v. Mr.Rengarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed against respondents for disobedience of an order in W.P.(MD) No.22553 of 2015 regarding unpaid terminal benefits. Court recorded submission that dues will be calculated and paid within two months, closing the petition with liberty to revive upon non-compliance.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed with liberty to revive in case of non-compliance by the contemnors.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 01.02.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Contempt Petition No.1349 of 2016 in W.P.(MD)No.22553 of 2015
G.Meenakshi ..Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.Rengarajan,
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Kumbakonam) Ltd., Kumbakonam.
2.Mr.Dharmaraj,
The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Karaikudi Region, Karaikudi.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents are in willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.(MD) No.22553 of 2015.
Whether to grant liberty to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition in case of non-compliance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.Meenakshi
- respondent
Mr. Rengarajan
- respondent
Mr. Dharmaraj
- respondent
Mr. Arumugam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court