Allowed

V.Kochadai, S/O.M.Velu v. the Managing Director

Madras HC25 Jan 2017WP(MD)/1141/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by a retired transport corporation employee. Directing the transport corporation to pay the petitioner's unutilized terminal benefits in twelve equal monthly instalments, with a recourse to file separate proceedings for grievances regarding computation or accrued interest.

What did the court decide?

Direction to settle terminal benefits in twelve equal monthly instalments, payable within 10 days of each succeeding month interest @ 6% per annum, with interest @ 18% for delayed installments.

V.Kochadai, S/O.M.Velu Vs the Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.01.2017

¶3

CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶4

W.P(MD)No.1141 of 2017

V.Kochadai

... Petitioner

vs.

1.The Managing Director

¶9

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Madurai Region Madurai.

¶10

2.The General Manager

¶11

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Madurai Region Madurai.

¶12

3.Mr.Arumugam

¶13

The Administrative Officer

¶14

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation

¶15

Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai,

¶16

Chennai – 600 002 ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay him Rs.8,42,304/- towards gratuity together with 18% interest per annum and also arrears of pension for the period from 29.02.2016 by revising his pension together with 18% interest per annum after calculating all his terminal / pension benefits based on the monthly wages payable to him on the month of the petitioner's retirement i.e. 29.02.2016 by revising the same as per the settlement, dated 13.04.15 as ordered by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this court in its order, dated 29.01.2016 in W.A.(MD).No.1457/2015 and etc.,

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr. K.Bhaskaran For Respondents : Mr.AP.Muthu Pandian Standing Counsel

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The petitioner was employed as Senior Grade Tradesman in the respondents Corporation and he retired from service on 29.02.2016 on attaining the age of superannuation.

¶21

2.He has filed this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to pay the retirement benefits.

¶22

3.The First Bench of this Court in similar matter has passed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ an order dated 12.06.2015 in W.A.(MD) Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, issuing direction to the transport Corporations to settle the terminal benefits of its employees in equal monthly instalments and to pay 6% interest on the terminal benefits payable to the workman. The Bench has also held that workman is entitled to 18%

¶23

¶24

interest for the defaulted period of instalment.

¶25

4.In these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶26

i)A direction is issued to the transport corporation to settle the terminal benefits of the petitioner that are yet to be settled, in twelve equal monthly instalments;

¶27

ii)The first installment shall commence by making payment on or before the 10^th March 2017 and the amount in each of the remaining instalments shall be paid on or before 10^th of every succeeding month;

¶28

iii) The said terminal amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum, as per the Division Bench judgment referred to above. In case of delay in making instalments, the interest payable could be 18% for the delayed period;

¶29

iv) The aforesaid direction to settle the terminal benefits would not preclude the workman to question the computation of any of the terminal benefits, if the same is paid lesser than the amount to which, he is entitled to receive. Likewise, if the petitioner has any grievance that he is entitled to interest for the amount already settled, he can agitate the same as per law, if he is entitled. No costs.

¶30

Sd/-

¶31

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶32

/TRUE COPY/

¶33

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶34

¶35

1.The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Madurai Region Madurai. 2.The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd. Madurai Region Madurai. 3.Mr.Arumugam The Administrative Officer Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶36

+2ccs to Mr.K.Bhaskaran, Advocate, SR.No:4080

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

W.P(MD)No.1141 of 2017 25.01.2017

¶39

vsn

¶40

sva/bs/08.02.2017/2p/6c

V.Kochadai, S/O.M.Velu v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Kochadai, S/O.M.Velu v. the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Subramanian Vs the District Elementary

R.Narayanan, Vs the Inspector of Police

The Superintending Engineer Vs the Collector

A.John Balasingh Vs the Chief Engineer/Personnel

M/S. Mmr Traders Vs the Deputy Commercial Tax

S.Ganesh, S/O.a.Subbaiyah, Vs the Deputy Registrar