Disposed

M/S. Mmr Traders v. the Deputy Commercial Tax

Madras HC25 Jan 2017WP(MD)/1009/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a petition to condone a 155-day delay in filing a second appeal. The High Court inclined to condone the delay upon payment of Rs.500 to the Legal Services Committee within one week, setting aside the petition as dismissed if payment is not made. Order directs registry to list the second appeal for admission upon payment.

What did the court decide?

Conditionally condoned 155-day delay in filing second appeal subject to payment of Rs.500 cost to Legal Services Committee within one week.

M/S. Mmr Traders Vs the Deputy Commercial Tax — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

EFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Fifteenth day of March Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶6

CMP(MD) No.7881 of 2018 IN SA(MD) No.SR34122 of 2018

¶7

RAJA

¶8

... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

1 SP.PERIANNAN

2 SUBBIAH

THIRUNAVUKKARASU (DIED)

¶13

3 MURUGESAN

¶14

4 SUMATHI ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 155 days in filing the second appeal in S.A. (MD)SR.No.34122 of 2018 and thus render justice.

¶16

PRAYER IN SA(MD) No.SR34122 of 2018

¶17

To set aside the decree and judgment in A.S.No. 16 of 2014 on the file of Sub Court, Devakottai dated 14.11.2017 confirming the judgment and decree passed in OS.No. 2 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Devakottai dated 22.11.2013 and thus render justice.

¶18

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.C.JEYAPRAKASH, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.RAJESWARAN, Advocate for R2 and for R1 and R4 not appeared either in person or by an Advocate, the court made the following order:-

¶19

Heard.

¶20

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 155 days in filing the above Second Appeal. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

2.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in

¶22

¶23

support of the petition and also considering the length of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay subject to the payment of cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) to the Legal Services Committee, attached to this Bench within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

¶24

3.This petition is accordingly ordered.

¶25

In the event of payment of cost, the Registry is directed to number the second appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same “for admission” forthwith.

¶26

15/03/2019

¶27

/ TRUE COPY /

¶28

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶29

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶30

Madurai - 625 023.

¶31

¶32

1 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE DEVAKOTTAI

¶33

2 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF DEVAKOTTAI

¶34

COPY TO:- 1. THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶35

THE SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR,

¶36

AE SECTION MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

¶37

ORDER IN

¶38

CMP(MD) No.7881 of 2018 IN

¶39

SA(MD) No.SR34122 of 2018

¶40

Date :15/03/2019

¶41

MSI/JC/SAR 4/22.03.2019/2P-5C

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S. Mmr Traders v. the Deputy Commercial Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Mmr Traders v. the Deputy Commercial Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Subramanian Vs the District Elementary

R.Narayanan, Vs the Inspector of Police

The Superintending Engineer Vs the Collector

A.John Balasingh Vs the Chief Engineer/Personnel

S.Ganesh, S/O.a.Subbaiyah, Vs the Deputy Registrar

V.Kochadai, S/O.M.Velu Vs the Managing Director