Dismissed

R.Narayanan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC24 Jan 2017CRL OP(MD)/574/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking an extension to comply with a prior order regarding cost accommodation. The court held there was no merit as the underlying civil matter has been pending for four years without resolution.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time to comply with the order dated 28/08/2018 denied; petition dismissed.

R.Narayanan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Monday, the Twenty Second day of October Two Thousand Eighteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

CRL MP(MD) NO.8278 Of 2018

¶7

in CRL RC(MD) No.574 of 2017

¶8

1.SHANAWAS

¶9

2.BABU

¶10

3.MUMTAJ BEGAM ... Petitioners/Petitioners/Appellants/Respondents

¶11

¶12

SHAMEM BANU ... Respondent/Respondent/Respondent/Petitioner Prayer in CRL MP(MD). 8278/ 2018 :

¶13

This Petition is filed under Section 482 of C.PC, Praying to extend four months time for comply the order passed by this Honoruable Court in Crl.R.C.(MD) NO.574 of 2017 dated 28/08/2018.

¶14

Prayer in CRL RC(MD). 574/ 2017 :

¶15

Revision filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records connected with the order in Criminal Appeal No.50 of 2016 dated 06.03.2017 on the file of the III Additional District Sessions Court, Tiruchirappalli in order dated 17.09.2016 in Cr.M.P. No.2443 of 2015 in M.C. No.94 of 2014 on the file of the Additional Mahila Court, Tiruchirappalli and set aside the same as illegal.

¶16

ORDER : This Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions is coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.R.Alagumani, Advocate, for the respondent, this Court made the following Order:

¶17

Perused the petition for extension of time. This Court finds no merit in entertaining this petition. M.C. No.94 of 2014 is pending for the past four years. Challenging the cost imposed on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the petitioner the criminal revision case was filed but till date neither the accommodation nor the arrears amount paid. Therefore,

¶18

¶19

this petition is dismissed.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar(AD-I) /True Copy/

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-)

¶22

¶23

1.The III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruchirappalli 2.The Judicial Magistraqte Additional Mahila Court, Tiruchirappalli +1. CC to Mr.R.Alagumani Advocate SR.No.91526

¶24

Date :22/10/2018 CRL MP(MD) NO.8278 Of 2018 in CRL RC(MD) No.574 of 2017 Direction given else as stated within

¶25

SP/09.04.2019/ 2P/4C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Narayanan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Narayanan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Chandra Vs the Executive Engineer

M.Thangapandi, Vs Union of India, Rep. by Secy.

V.S.Ramaiah, Vs the Principal Secretary

S. Subramanian Vs the District Elementary

The Superintending Engineer Vs the Collector

G. Anana Elpinston Vs Directorate of Collegiate