Dismissed

S. Subramanian v. the District Elementary

Madras HC24 Jan 2017WP(MD)/10049/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order and approval of promotion as B.T. Assistant. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, which was accepted, and the writ petition and related miscellaneous petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition and miscellaneous petitions (MD) Nos. 1 and 2 of 2014 dismissed as withdrawn.

S. Subramanian Vs the District Elementary — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.01.2017

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶5

W.P(MD)No.10049 of 2014 and M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014

S.Subramanian

... Petitioner

vs.

1)The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli.

¶10

2)The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Keezhapavur at Pavvorchathram,

¶11

Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

¶12

3)The Secretary,

¶13

Hindu Middle School, Chennalthapudukulam, Keezhapavur Union, Pavvorchathram,

¶14

Tenkasi Taluk,

¶15

Tirunelveli District.

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the 2^nd respondent in his proceedings A.Thi.Mu.No.83/A1/14, dated 12.04.2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents to approve the promotion of the petitioner as B.T. Assistant and confer all the consequential benefits.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam

¶19

For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.P.Krishnadass Government Advocate

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, M.P (MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 are closed.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar (RTI)

¶24

/True Copy/

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

¶28

¶29

1)The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli.

¶30

2)The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Keezhapavur at Pavvorchathram,

¶31

Tenkasi Taluk,Tirunelveli District.

¶32

+1 cc to Mr. V.Panneerselvam, Advocate, SR.No.3872

¶33

+1 cc to The Special Government Pleader in SR.No.3549

¶34

nbi

¶35

GJM/MPA/SAR-I/30.01.2017:2P/5C

¶36

W.P(MD)No.10049 of 2014 24.01.2017

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Subramanian v. the District Elementary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Subramanian v. the District Elementary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Chandra Vs the Executive Engineer

M.Thangapandi, Vs Union of India, Rep. by Secy.

V.S.Ramaiah, Vs the Principal Secretary

R.Narayanan, Vs the Inspector of Police

The Superintending Engineer Vs the Collector

G. Anana Elpinston Vs Directorate of Collegiate