Disposed

V.Krishnasamy v. The Assistant Electrical

Madras HC13 Jun 2017WP/6951/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought name transfer of electricity connections on agricultural land purchased via sale deeds. The Electricity Board refused due to objections by the second respondent. The Court directed the Board to decide after due notice and issue a notice to the second respondent within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to respondent No.1 to take a decision on name transfer after due notice to the petitioner and respondent No.2 within eight weeks.

V.Krishnasamy Vs The Assistant Electrical — Property and Title | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 13.06.2017

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶5

W.P.No.6951 of 2017

¶6

V.Krishnasamy ... Petitioner

¶7

¶8

The Assistant Electrical Engineer Operation and Distribution Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle, Ponnampalayam, Sathyamangalam Taluk Erode District.

¶9

Ramatthal ... Respondents

¶10

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to take necessary action to do name transfer in favour of the petitioner in Electricity service connection no.114 & 116 which is in petitioner's agricultural land at Survey number 478/1, 2, 475/3, 479/2 presently sub divided in 478/3A, 3B, 478/1B in Panaiyampalli Village, Sathiyamangalam Taluk, Erode District pursuant to the petitioner's representation dated 28.04.2016.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thirumoorthy

¶12

For Respondents: Mr.S.K.Rameshwar for R1

¶13

No appearance for R2

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

In pursuant to the sale effected by one Ramathal, the second respondent herein, on 27.12.2011 in favour of the one Jayabalan, who in turn sold the said property in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner has also purchased another property by sale deed dated 27.01.2015 from one Samarjith. The petitioner has made an application seeking name transfer for Electricity service connection Nos. 114 & 116. The properties in question are the agricultural lands. It appears that the said request was not considered in view of the objections made by the respondent No.2. Therefore the present writ petition is filed.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Despite notice having been served on the respondent No.2, and her name is also been printed in the cause list, none appears for her.

¶18

A mere objection per se cannot be a ground to reject the request. In such view of the matter, a direction is issued to the respondent No.1 to take a decision after due notice to the petitioner and the respondent No.2, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It the respondent No.1 is satisfied that the respondent No.2 does not have any title, naturally the name transfer will have to be effected subject to the other compliance by the petitioner. The said endeavor has to be done within a period of eight weeks. No costs.

¶19

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar raa/jer To The Assistant Electrical Engineer Operation and Distribution Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle, Ponnampalayam, Sathyamangalam Taluk Erode District. +1cc to Mr.R.Thirumoorthy, Advocate Sr.41830 [21/06/2017]

¶20

W.P.No.6951 of 2017 nr[co] srg 16/06/2017

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Krishnasamy v. The Assistant Electrical

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Krishnasamy v. The Assistant Electrical

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Vasanthalakshmi Vs The Assistant Commissioner

United Labour Federation, Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

K.Janarthanam Vs The Executive Engineer, O&M

K.Prabakar, Vs The Chairman

N.C.Saravanan Vs The Assistant Engineer

P.Mani, Vs J.Muthulakshmi