Disposed

S.Kuppuswamy v. The Superintending Engineer

Madras HC2 Feb 2017WP/39151/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation regarding a withheld amount and pass orders on merits after giving opportunity, without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 17.02.2016 and pass appropriate orders after opportunity; no costs.

S.Kuppuswamy Vs The Superintending Engineer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

¶2

Dated: 02.02.2017

¶3

Coram

¶4

The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

W.P.No.39151 of 2016

¶6

1 S.Kuppuswamy [ PETITIONER ]

¶7

¶8

1 The Superintending Engineer Public Works Department W.R.O.,

¶9

Ground Water Circle, Arunandha Nagar, Thanjavur 613 007.

¶10

2 The Executive Engineer. Public Works Department. W.R.O.. Ground Water Circle, Adaikala Nagar, Hasthampatti, Salem 636 007.

¶11

3 The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, W.R.O., Pollachi, Coimbatore District. [ RESPONDENTS ]

¶12

Prayer:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner representation letter dated 17.2.2016 to disburse the withheld amount.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saranraj

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.A.Kumar Special Government Pleader

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This writ petition is filed to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner representation letter dated 17.2.2016 to disburse the withheld amount.

¶17

2.Heard both sides.

¶18

3.In view of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, this court without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, directs the second respondent to consider the

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

representation of the petitioner dated 17.02.2016 and to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶21

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vri
To
1 The Superintending Engineer
Public Works Department W.R.O.,
Ground Water Circle, Arunandha Nagar,
Thanjavur 613 007.
2 The Executive Engineer.
Public Works Department. W.R.O.. Ground
Water Circle, Adaikala Nagar, Hasthampatti,
Salem 636 007.
3 The Executive Engineer,
Public Works Department, W.R.O., Pollachi,
Coimbatore District.
+1cc to Mr.Saranraj, Advocate, S.R.No.6693
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.6946
CNR(CO)
RS(22/02/2017)
W.P.No.39151 of 2016

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Kuppuswamy v. The Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Kuppuswamy v. The Superintending Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Harikrishnan, Vs The Tahsildar

Tmt. Panchavaranam, Vs The District Collector

Smt. Arokiyamary, Vs The District Collector

Mr.K.Jeganathan Vs The District Collector

K.Suresh Vs District Collector

K.G.Selvaranga Mudaliyar Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer