K.Harikrishnan, Vs The Tahsildar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.02.2017

¶2

CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN W.P.No.21777 of 2014

K.Hari Krishnan

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore District. ... Respondent

¶7

Prayer: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2014.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Murugan

¶9

For Respondent : Mr.S.Rajeswaran, Spl. GP.

¶10

ORDER

¶11

This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.02.2014 and to pass orders.

¶12

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

¶13

3.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for by the petitioner in this writ petition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, this Court directs the respondent to consider the representation dated 12.02.2014 given by the petitioner and to pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

-s/d-

Assistant Registrar

True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

To

¶21

1.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Katpadi Taluk, Vellore District

¶22

+1 cc to M/s.P.Murugan Advocate sr 6284

¶23

+1 cc to Government Pleader sr 6471

¶24

W.P.No.21777 of 2014
rp(co)
aa16/02/2017

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Harikrishnan, v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Harikrishnan, v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C. Dhanalakshmi, Vs The District Revenue Officer

The Correspondent, Vs The Joint Director of Training

D.Ilayarani, Vs State Rep.by The Inspector

V.N.Public Health & Vs The Regional Manager

Tmt. Panchavaranam, Vs The District Collector

Smt. Arokiyamary, Vs The District Collector