Dismissed

Tamil Nadu Association for v. State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC2 Feb 2017WP/17221/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking to amend conditions in Play School Regulations, as such a challenge was already pending in a connected writ petition. The petitioner was granted liberty to implead themselves in the connected matter.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with liberty to implead in connected W.P. No. 24139 of 2016 or challenge the Regulation.

Tamil Nadu Association for Vs State of Tamil… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 02.02.2017

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

WRIT PETITION No.17221 of 2016

¶6

Tamil Nadu Association for
Early Childhood
Care and Development (TNECCD),
Regn.No.379/2014
rep. by the Secretary,
26, Ranganathan Avenue Road,
Sylvan Lodge Colony,
Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. ... Petitioner
vs.
1. State of Tamil Nadu,
rep. by the Secretary,
Education Department,
Fort St. George,
Chennai 600 009.
2. The Director of School
Education,
College Road,
Chennai 600 034.
3. The Director of Elementary
Education,
College Road,
Chennai 600 034. ... Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing
the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation
dated 27.04.2016 and redress their grievances of the members of
the petitioner Association forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mrs.Hema Sampath, Senior Counsel
for Mrs.R.Meenal
For Respondents: Mr.V.Anandhamoorthy,
Additional Government Pleader

¶7

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

The petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider their representation dated 27.04.2016 to amend some of the stringent conditions in the Regulations framed for Play Schools.

¶10

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents that the Regulations for Play Schools, 2015 has been challenged in a Writ Petition in W.P.No.24139 of 2016.

¶11

In such view of the matter, this Court is of the view that the relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted at this stage. Hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed, however, with liberty to the petitioner either to implead themselves in the connected W.P.No.24139 of 2016 or challenge the said Regulation.

¶12

No costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.No.14696 of 2016 is
closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
aeb
To:
1. The Secretary,
State of Tamil Nadu,
Education Department,
Fort St. George,Chennai 600 009.
2. The Director of School Education,
College Road, Chennai 600 034.
3. The Director of Elementary Education,
College Road, Chennai 600 034.
+1cc to M/s. R.Meenal, Advocate, S.R.No.6764.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.6928
AD(CO)
EU 15.2.17
W.P.No.17221 of 2016

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tamil Nadu Association for v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamil Nadu Association for v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Harikrishnan, Vs The Tahsildar

Tmt. Panchavaranam, Vs The District Collector

Smt. Arokiyamary, Vs The District Collector

Mr.K.Jeganathan Vs The District Collector

K.Suresh Vs District Collector

S.Kuppuswamy Vs The Superintending Engineer