A second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code was dismissed for default as no representation was made by the appellant on the day of hearing.
The second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Connected M.P. is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.04.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
S.A.No.696 of 2013
Rose Mary .. Appellant/Appellant/1st Defendant
Vs.
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 15.11.2012 made in A.S.No.29 of 2010 on the file of the III Additional District & Sessions Court, Salem, confirming the judgment and degree dated 16.02.2010 made in O.S.No.301 of 2000 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Salem.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents: Not ready in notice
J U D G M E N T
When the Second Appeal came up for hearing on 11.04.2017, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 12.04.2017.
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
To:
kj(co)
krd 20/4
S.A.No.696 of 2013
Rose Mary
Manimalar Nithiniruvanam
S. Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
