Dismissed
M.Ramajayam v. Sathasivam
Madras HCSA/1209/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the Second Appeal for non-prosecution as neither the appellants nor the respondent appeared when the matter was listed for hearing.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.04.2017
¶2
CORAM:
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
¶4
S.A.No.1209 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011
¶5
- M.Ramajayam
2. G.Singaravel
3. Shanmughavelu .. Appellants/Defendants
Vs.
Sathasivam .. Respondent/Plaintiff
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure
Code against the judgment and decree dated 14.07.2004 in
A.S.No.23 of 2004 on the file of the Additional Subordinate
Court, Nagapattinam, against the judgment and decree dated
30.12.2003 in O.S.No.419 of 2000 on the file of the District
Munsif Court, Nagapattinam.
For appellants : No appearance
For respondent : Served with notice - No appearance
JUDGMENT
When the Second Appeal was taken up for hearing on
06.04.2017, there was no representation for the appellants, and
hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption "for
dismissal" on 10.04.2017 (today). Even today, there is no
representation for the appellants. Therefore, the Second Appeal
is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. The Miscellaneous
Petition is closed.
¶6
Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS III ) /true copy/
¶7
Sub Asst. Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
M. Ramajayam
- appellant
G. Singaravel
- appellant
Shanmughavelu
- respondent
Sathasivam
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court