The High Court dismissed a second appeal due to the appellant's total non-appearance and non-prosecution at the hearing held on 06.04.2017 and the subsequent listing date of 10.04.2017.
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
Perumal .. Appellant Vs. Ranganathan (died) 1. Muniammal 2. Sivanandam 3. Ravi 4. Sakthi .. Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 16.08.2011 in A.S.No.28 of 2006 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Dharmapuri, confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.08.2005 in O.S.No.424 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dharmapuri.
For appellant : No appearance For respondent : Mr.I.Abrar Md. Abdullah JUDGMENT
When the Second Appeal was taken up for hearing on 06.04.2017, there was no representation for the appellant, and hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 10.04.2017 (today). Even today, there is no representation for the appellant. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. C.M.P. is closed.
Sub Asst. Registrar
to:
sai(co)
krd 18/4
S.A.No.1568 of 2011
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second appeal filed by the appellant, who was absent from the hearing, should be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Perumal
Muniammal
Sivanandam
Ravi
Sakthi
Ranganathan (died)
S. Vaidyanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
S. Vaidyanathan
Parties & counsel
