The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed an appeal because the appellant's counsel did not press the matter and elected to agitate the claim in separate civil proceedings.
Appeal dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.01.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
O.S.A.No.390 of 2012
K.M.Padmini ... Appellant/Applicant
Vs.
1. TPSH Aamarnath @ Prabhakar Ramsait,
26, Sokkalal Street, Mukkadal,
Ambasamudram Taluk,
Nellai Kattabomman District.
2. TPSH Parthiban Ramsait,
Door No.6-D, Colony C,
Perumalpuram,
Tirunelveli – 627 007.
3. TPSH Kanchana
4. TPSH Prasanna
5. TPSH Sokkalal Ramsait
6. TPSH Sasinthana ... Respondents/Respondents
Appeal filed under Order XXXVI, Rule 9 of Original Side
Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order
dated 21.09.2012made in Application No.356 of 2012 in O.P.No.814
of 1998 on the file of this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Thiagarajan For Respondents : Mr.P.Vasanth for R6 No appearance for R1 to R5 JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The learned counsel for the appellant does not press the appeal, but states that the rights of the appellant which she claim may be permitted to be agitated in the civil proceedings – C.S.No.434 of 2012. Endorsement has been made.
K.M. Padmini
TPSH Aamarnath @ Prabhakar Ramsait
TPSH Parthiban Ramsait
TPSH Kanchana
TPSH Prasanna
TPSH Sokkalal Ramsait
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
M. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
