The Madras High Court dismissed a petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail. The court held that the petition did not arise due to pending litigation on the merits of the case on other forums.
Petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL MP(MD) No.5936 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.12025 of 2014
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTUKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT, CR NO. 233/2014. ... PETITIONER/RESPONENT/ COMPLAINANT
Vs
DR. RAJENDRAN S/O. RUTHRAPATHY PILAI, NO. 54, CHETTY STREET, PATTUKOTTAI TOWN,
THANJAVUR DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/
SOLE ACCUSED
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased tocancel the Anticipatory bail granted to the respondent by this Honourable Court in Crl. O. P (MD) NO. 12025/2014 dated 01.07.2014 and pass such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) for the petitioner and of MR.S.VELLAICHAMY, Advocate on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-
The petitioner / State has filed this cancellation of anticipatory bail petition to cancel the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12025 of 2014 on 01.07.2014.
2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the petitioner / State would submit that after granting anticipatory bail to the accused herein, the victim has approached this Court by way of filing a Writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.15208 of 2016, wherein this Court issued a direction to conduct a DNA test.
3.Aggrieved by that order, the accused preferred a Writ Appeal https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ and the same was dismissed confirming the order passed by the Learned Single Judge of this Court. As against the Division Bench
order, the accused herein has preferred Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Apex Court and the Hon'ble Apex Court granted interim order.
4.In view of the above, the petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail does not arise. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
sd/-
04/10/2017 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
| 1 | THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATTUKKOTTAI |
|---|---|
| 2 | THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, |
| THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM | |
| 3 | THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, |
| PATTUKKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT | |
| 4 | THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR |
| MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. |
ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.5936 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.12025 of 2014 Date :04/10/2017
PK/RR-BS/SAR-1/23.10.2017 : 2P/5C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail pending in the High Court should be admitted given pending litigations on other forums affecting the bail status.
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTUKOTTAI
DR. RAJENDRAN S/O. RUTHRAPATHY PILAI
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
