Disposed

Patchaiammal, v. the Inspector of Registration

Madras HC8 Feb 2016WP(MD)/2637/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court directed the District Registrar to dispose of pending enquiry proceedings regarding a fraudulent transaction and settle deed expeditiously, in accordance with law and after giving notice to all parties concerned.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to dispose of the pending proceedings and pass appropriate orders on merits expeditiously after giving notice to all parties concerned.

Patchaiammal, Vs the Inspector of Registration — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

Patchaiammal

¶3

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶4

DATED: 08.02.2016

¶5

CORAM :

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶7

Writ Petition (MD) No.2637 of 2016

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Inspector of Registration, Santhome, Mylapore,

¶11

Chennai 21.

¶12

The District Registrar, Trichirappali, Trichirappalli District.

¶13

The Sub Registrar, K.Sathanoor Sub Registrar Office, K.K.Nagar, Trichirappalli,

¶14

Trichirappalli District.

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to continue the enquiry of the proceeding in Na.Ka.No.18320/M1/2011 pending before 2nd respondent till date and complete same in accordance with circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011 issued by 1st respondent within the time frame stipulated by this Court.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Chandran For Respondents : Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader.

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The petitioner has given an application to enquire into the alleged fraudulent transaction in the sale deed. In fact, settlement deed executed on the basis of the illegal documents is wrong and an enquiry under circular 67, dated 03.11.2011 is pending. Therefore, the petitioner seeks to dispose of the said enquiry proceedings at an early date.

¶20

2.Learned Additional Government Pleader fairly submitted that after the enquiry conducted by the Revenue Divisional Officer, it has been taken on file and the same is pending.

¶21

3.In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to dispose of the above said proceedings and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to all the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible. No costs.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar

¶24

/True copy/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

¶27

¶28

The Inspector of Registration, Santhome, Mylapore, Chennai 21. 2. The District Registrar, Trichirappali, Trichirappalli District. 3. The Sub Registrar, K.Sathanoor Sub Registrar Office, K.K.Nagar, Trichirappalli, Trichirappalli District +2 CC to M/s.B.Chandran, Advocate, SR No.7538 +1 CC to the Special Government Pleader, SR No.7675

¶29

Writ Petition (MD) No.2637 of 2016 08.02.2016

¶30

sms SH/GSV-AN :18.02.2016:2P/7C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Patchaiammal, v. the Inspector of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Patchaiammal, v. the Inspector of Registration

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

All Government Contractors Vs the District Collector

Subramaniyan, Vs the Regional Manager

Shri Jothilingam Pattu Mahal Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

R.Kalyanasundari Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

P.Noor Mohammed, Vs the Chairman

A.Muniammal Vs the Electrical Engineer(Distn)