Disposed

All Government Contractors v. the District Collector

Madras HC5 Feb 2016WP(MD)/2551/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court entertained a writ petition by a welfare association seeking a tender for canal maintenance. The court held the petition could be treated as an individual representation by the petitioner's member and directed the engineer to consider it.

What did the court decide?

Direct the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.02.2016 as an individual representation, pass appropriate orders within four weeks, and close W.M.P No.2260 of 2016.

All Government Contractors Vs the District… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.02.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN Writ Petition (MD) No.2551 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.2260 of 2016

¶5

All Government Contractors Welfare Association Rep by its President, having office at No.340, Pandian Nagar, Melur 625 106, Madurai District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District. 2.The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department (WRO) Tallakulam, Madurai 2. 3.The Superintending Engineer Public Works Department (WRO) Near Meenakshi Amman Koil, Madurai.

¶6

4.The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department (WRO), Periyar Main Channel Division, Main Road, Melur, Madurai 625 106. ... Respondents

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 4th respondent to call for Tender for maintenance work of Periyar Main Canal Melur Division and to issue tender notice to the members of the Petitioner Association for maintenance work of Periyar Main Canal Melur Division for the year 2015 to 2016.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, Additional Government Pleader.

¶9

ORDER

¶10

The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking for the issue of a writ of mandamus, to direct the fourth respondent to call for tender for maintenance work of Periyar Main https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Canal, Melur Division and to issue tender notice to the members of the petitioner association for maintenance work of Periyar Main Canal Melur Division for the year 2015-2016.

¶11

¶12

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.

¶13

3.After some elaborate arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be treated as a writ petition filed by an individual and not by the association and the respondents may be directed to consider of the representation of the petitioner, only dated 01.02.2016.

¶14

4.In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.02.2016 as an individual representation and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving opportunity to the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P(MD)No.2260 of 2016 is closed.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar(P&A)

¶17

/True copy/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶19

sms

¶20

¶21

1.The District Collector, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶22

2.The Chief Engineer,

¶23

Public Works Department (WRO), Tallakulam, Madurai 2.

¶24

3.The Superintending Engineer Public Works Department (WRO) Near Meenakshi Amman Koil, Madurai.

¶25

4.The Executive Engineer,

¶26

Public Works Department (WRO), Periyar Main Channel Division, Main Road, Melur, Madurai 625 106.

¶27

+1 cc to Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan, Advocate, SR No.7036

¶28

+1 cc to Special Government Pleader,SR No.7420

¶29

Writ Petition (MD) No.2551 of 2016 and W.M.P(MD)No.2260 of 2016 05.02.2016

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ RG.SK-SKN/SAR-I 10.02.2016 2P/7C

All Government Contractors v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

All Government Contractors v. the District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Easwaran Vs Mr. Ragupathy Raju

K.Marimuthu Vs the State Rep. by

State Rep. by Vs U. Lavanya

Subramaniyan, Vs the Regional Manager

Shri Jothilingam Pattu Mahal Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Ganesan, S/O.Mayandi, Vs the Disrtict Collector