Allowed

Ruban Raj, S/O.Arulsamy v. the Branch Manager

Madras HC5 Oct 2016WP(MD)/11815/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted a writ of mandamus directing the respondent bank to consider and grant the petitioner's application for an educational loan within four weeks, dismissing the petition upon the bank's assurance that the application was under consideration.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent bank to consider and grant the educational loan application within four weeks.

Ruban Raj, S/O.Arulsamy Vs the Branch Manager — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.10.2016 CORAM :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶4

Writ Petition (MD) No.11815 of 2016

¶5

Ruban Raj ... Petitioner Vs.

¶6

The Branch Manager, Karur Vysya Bank, Madukkur Branch, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District. ... Respondent

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent bank to grant to me the educational loan of 4 years total rupees 3,30, 800/- (three lakhs thirty thousand and Eight Hundred only) for enabling the petitioners to peruse and continue the petitioners higher educational studies in B.E. Mechanical Engineering at Coimbatore Institute of Engineering and Technology Vellimalaipattinam Coimbatore District.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sekar For Respondent : Mr.Pala.Ramasamy

¶9

ORDER

¶10

According to the petitioner, the petitioner joined B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) at Coimbatore Institute of Engineering and Technology, Vellimalaipattinam, Coimbatore District. Therefore, the petitioner filed an application before the respondent Bank seeking educational loan for a sum of Rs.3,30,800/- on 29.08.2015. Since the said application has not been considered so far, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶11

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the application of the petitioner is under consideration and they will pass suitable orders.

¶12

3.In view of the above said submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the respondent bank is directed to consider his application and grant educational loan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶13

¶14

4.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶15

Sd/ Assistant Registrar(T & P)

¶16

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶17

¶18

The Branch Manager, Karur Vysya Bank, Madukkur Branch, Pattukottai Taluk, Thanjavur District.

¶19

+1cc to M/S.T.Sekar, Advocate in SR.No.59551.

¶20

+1cc to M/S.Pala.Ramasamy, Advocate in SR.No.59674.

¶21

Writ Petition (MD) No.11815 of 2016 05.10.2016

¶22

sms msm/ck/sar-1/26.10.16/p2/4c

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ruban Raj, S/O.Arulsamy v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ruban Raj, S/O.Arulsamy v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Selvin, S/O.Poomani Vs the Sub Divisional Magistrate

Muthusenapathi, Vs the District Collector

K.Subburathinam Vs the District Collector

K. Sudhakar Vs the State Inforamtion

K.Danalakshmi Vs the Superintendent of Police

Minor. a. Vignesh Vs the Secretary to Government