The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 to direct the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to remove obstructions in specific survey numbers. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which the Court granted.
Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:04.10.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Writ Petition(MD)No.19253 of 2016
P.Selvin ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Sub-Divisional Magistrate cum
Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagercoil, Kanaykumari District.
2.V.Kumar ... Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 07.03.2016 and to remove the obstructions made by the 2nd respondent in the 'Varappu' located in Re-survey No.244/14B, 245/7, 247, 244/12 and 244/13 of Esanthimangalam Village, Thovalai Taluk.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sivakumar
For Respondent-1: Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (RTI) /True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
2
pm
To
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagercoil, Kanaykumari District.
GJM/SKS/RR/18.10.16-2p-2C
W.P(MD)No.19253 of 2016 04.10.2016
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Selvin
The Sub-Divisional Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Nagercoil
V.Kumar
V.Bharithidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
