Disposed

Dr.v.P.Hariharavel Mds., v. The Director

Madras HC14 Jul 2016WP/9235/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court directed the Respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 19.1.2016 regarding appointment to the post of Assistant Surgeon (Dental) within three months, considering the availability of vacancies due to non-joining by selected MDS candidates.

What did the court decide?

Direct the 1st Respondent to dispose of the representation dated 19.1.2016 within three months in line with the 3rd Respondent's counter affidavit.

Dr.v.P.Hariharavel Mds., Vs The Director — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 14.07.2016

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN

¶5

WP.No.9235 of 2016 WMP.No.8206 of 2016

¶6

Dr.V.P.Hariharavel, MDS
(Pedodontics and
Preventive Dentistry) ... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Director, Medical and Rural Health Services
Chennai-6
2.The Director, Medical Education,
Chennai-10
3.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Medical Service
Recruitment Board (MRB),
Chennai-6 ... Respondents

¶7

Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 19.1.2016 and appoint the Petitioner to the post of Assistant Surgeon (Dental) pursuant to the notification no.5/2014, dated 10.08.2014.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramesh Venkatachalapathy For Respondent : Mr.K.V.Dhanapal-RR1&2 Mr.A.Vivek-R3

¶9

ORDER

¶10

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 19.1.2016 and appoint the Petitioner to the post of Assistant Surgeon (Dental) pursuant to the notification no.5/2014, dated 10.08.2014.

¶11

This court heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the materials placed on record.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

The learned counsel for the Petitioner would contend that the Petitioner, who is a Dental Surgeon, had attended the interview for selection to the post of Assistant Surgeon (Dental) and he was also called for certificate verification, but he was not selected and that out of 31 vacancies, the 5 MDS candidates did not joint the post and still there are 5 vacancies available and stating so, the Petitioner also sent a representation dated 19.1.2016 to the 1st Respondent, which has not been considered so far and it would be suffice if the representation of the Petitioner is disposed of, expeditiously.

¶14

The learned standing counsel for the 3rd Respondent, by filing a counter, has categorically stated that out of 31 vacancies, 5 MDS candidates, who have been provisionally selected, did not joint duty till date and the 1st Respondent has also sent a proposal to the appointing authority to remove the names of such 5 candidates, which is pending.

¶15

In view of the admission made in the counter regarding the five vacancies and the fact the Petitioner appeared in the interview and he was also called for certificate verification, the 1st Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner dated 19.1.2016, in line with the counter affidavit of the 3rd Respondent and on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶16

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected MP is closed.

¶17

Assistant Registrar(J)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

To:

¶21

1.The Director, Medical and Rural Health Services, Chennai-6.

¶22

2.The Director, Medical Education, Chennai-10.

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

3.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Medical Service Recruitment Board (MRB), Chennai-6.

¶25

+1cc to Mr.S.Yashwanth, Advocate sr.39587

¶26

+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.39715

¶27

WP.No.9235 of 2016

¶28

gj[co] srg 29/07/2016

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dr.v.P.Hariharavel Mds., v. The Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.v.P.Hariharavel Mds., v. The Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Sangeetha, Vs The Commissioner of

R.Nandhagopal, Vs The Joint Director of

P.Vasunathan, Vs The Secretary

P.Maragatham, Vs The Secretary to Government

M.Duraisamy ( 58 Yrs) Vs the Sub Collector

Mrs.v.Karpagam, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu