The applicant conceded there was unauthorised construction. The court held the applicant must face consequences of sealing even if part of the building is unauthorised and dismissed the application.
Application stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WMP No.16664 of 2016
The Hon`ble The CHIEF JUSTICE and
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. MAHADEVAN
K.Aswin Kumar @ Ambarish Kumar, No.58, Narayana Mudali Street, Chennai-600 079. Vs K.R.Ramaswamy @
Traffic Ramaswamy. and 7 others.
On our query, learned counsel for the applicant concedes that there is some unauthorised construction. If it is so, then the applicant must face the consequences of sealing even if any part of the building is unauthorised.
The application stands dismissed.
[CJ] [R M D J]
02/09/2016
KSR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application must be dismissed given the concession of unauthorised construction by the applicant
K.Aswin Kumar @ Ambarish Kumar
K.R.Ramaswamy @ Traffic Ramaswamy
CHIEF JUSTICE
R. MAHADEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
