Disposed

V.Venkatesan v. State of Tamilnadu rep.

Madras HC1 Sept 2016WP/11814/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition filed against local authorities regarding a dispute between neighbors. The Court observed the matter was not a public interest litigation and directed the Municipal Commissioner to consider the petitioner's representation with notice to all concerned before proceeding.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent 5 to consider the petitioner's representation after notice to all concerned; petition disposed of.

V.Venkatesan Vs State of Tamilnadu rep. — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.09.2016

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶5

AND

¶6

The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN

¶7

W.P. No.11814 of 2015

¶8

and

¶9

M.P.No.1 of 2015

¶10

V.Venkatesan .. Petitioner

¶11

-vs-

¶12

1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Local and Municipal Administration, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Office of the Thiruvannamalai District, Collectorate, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶13

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District. 4.The Block Development Officer, Office of the Block Development Officer, Vembakkam, Vembakkam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. 5.The Municipal Commissioner, Thiruvatthipuram Municipality, Cheyyaru, Cheyyar Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District-604 407. 6.D.Venkatesan .. Respondents

¶14

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.2 to 5 to take necessary action on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 09.03.2015 against the 6^th respondent within such time frame as this Hon'ble Court may stipulated.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.K.Subramanian Govt. Pleader for R1 to R4 Mr.N.Jayaprakash Narayanan for R5 * * * * * O R D E R

¶17

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶18

The petition, really is not a public interest litigation, but the dispute is between the neighbours. Be that as it may, since the petitioner had made a representation dated 09.03.2015 to the respondents, respondent No.5 may look into the representation and deal with the same in accordance with law, after notice to all concerned.

¶19

The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2015 is closed.

¶20

Sd/Asst.Registrar (CCC) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, Local and Municipal Administration, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶21

2.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Office of the Thiruvannamalai District, Collectorate, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶22

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶23

4.The Block Development Officer, Office of the Block Development Officer, Vembakkam, Vembakkam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

5.The Municipal Commissioner, Thiruvatthipuram Municipality, Cheyyaru,

¶26

Cheyyar Taluk,

¶27

Thiruvannamalai District-604 407.

¶28

+1 cc to Ms.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, advocate,sr.49701

¶29

+1 cc to Govt.Pleader,sr49662.

¶30

nr(cOo) krd 19/9

¶31

W.P.No.11814 of 2015

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Venkatesan v. State of Tamilnadu rep.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Venkatesan v. State of Tamilnadu rep.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

I.H.Sekar, Vs the District Collector

Easy Group Ip Licensing Vs Premier Airways Ltd.

State of Tamilnadu Vs R.Gopika, Advocate

R.Muralidharan Vs The Secretary[deleted]

R.Muralidharan, Vs The Controller General of

M.Arumuga Reddiar Vs T.Kumar