Allowed

S.Imran Sheriff v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC14 Jun 2016CRL OP/11283/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Crl.O.P. under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR regarding domestic cruelty and dowry harassment. The Court allowed the petition after hearing counsel and ascertaining that the parties had amicably arrived at a settlement and the complainant wished to withdraw the complaint. The prosecution was quashed.

What did the court decide?

First Information Report in Crime No.01 of 2015 is quashed.

S.Imran Sheriff Vs the Inspector of Police — Domestic Violence | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 14.06.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.11283 of 2016

¶7

1.S.Imran Sheriff

¶8

2.Sardar Basha

¶9

3.Syedunissa

¶10

4.Shahin Farjana ...Petitioners

¶11

Vs.

¶12

1.The State Rep. by

¶13

The Inspector of Police, W-18, All Women Police Station, M.K.B. Nagar, Chennai – 39. (Crime No.01 of 2015)

¶14

2.S.Shabana

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to quash the First Information Report in Cr.No.01 of 2015, pending before the X Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai.

¶17

For Petitioners : Mr.A.S.K.Sha For Respondent [R1] : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to quash the FIR in Crime No.01 of 2015 pending before the learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

¶20

Heard the learned counsel on both sides.

¶21

¶22

On a complaint lodged by Shabana, the defactocomplainant/second respondent, the first respondent Police registered a case in Crime No.01 of 2015 on 01.06.2015, for the offences under Sections 498(A), 406 and 506(ii) IPC., against the petitioners herein.

¶23

Now, it appears that parties have amicably arrived at a settlement. Today, Ms.S.Shabana, the defacto-complainant and Mr.S.Imran Sheriff are present before this Court and they are identified by Ms.Nagomi, Grade-I Police, W18-All Women Police Station, M.K.B. Nagar, Chennai-600 039 (Mobile No.9498128352). A Memo of Compromise has been filed, wherein in paragraph No.1 & 2, it has been stated as follows :

¶24

“1. It is submitted that the petitioners are

¶25

charged under Section 498(A), 406 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.01 of 2015. The allegation of the prosecution case is that the the petitioners and the defacto complainant are husband and wife. On 23.05.2015, little clash between both parties due to cruelty and dowry harassment. Immediately F.I.R. was registered against the petitioners and a final report will be ready to file and the same was committal before X Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore.

¶26

It is submitted that since the petitioners and the defacto complainant are residing same and

¶27

¶28

both are compromised each other. The petitioner and defacto complainant ready to live separate matrimonial house. The petitioners made an apology for their sin act. The defacto complainant forgot the incident and she proposed to withdraw his complaint and the defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the petitioner further.”

¶29

In view of the above, the prosecution against the petitioners

¶30

in Crime No.01 of 2015 is hereby quashed. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is allowed.

14.06.2016

To:

1.The Inspector of Police, W-18, All Women Police Station, M.K.B. Nagar, Chennai – 39.

¶35

2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Chennai.

P.N.PRAKASH,J

Crl.O.P.No.11283 of 2016

¶40

14.06.2016

S.Imran Sheriff v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Imran Sheriff v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Natarajan Vs State Rep. by

H.Anji Vs the Inspector of Police

M/S.Lvr and Dong-in Stone Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Moorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

Balu Vs State by

L.David Vs the Superintendent of Police