Dismissed

H.Anji v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Jun 2016CRL OP/11569/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., directed the petitioner to cooperate with the police enquiry. If a cognizable offence is made out, the police must register a regular case following Lalita Kumari, otherwise the petition closes.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to cooperate with the enquiry; Police directed to register case if cognizable offence is made out, following Lalita Kumari; otherwise petition closed.

H.Anji Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2016)

¶1

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED:13.06.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶6

Crl.OP No.11569 of 2016

¶7

H.Anji ..Petitioner/Complainant Vs. The Inspector of Police Jolarpettai Police Station Jolarpettai Vellore District. ..Respondent/Respondent

¶8

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent to register the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 05.12.2015 and to investigate the crime and to file a final report before the competent court of law.

¶9

***

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to register the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 05.12.2015 and to investigate the crime and to file a final report before the competent court of law.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

¶15

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that petition enquiry is pending before the respondent and that the petitioner is not co-operating with the enquiry.

¶16

Hence, the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the enquiry and the respondent Police is directed to conduct enquiry and during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ offence is made out, a regular case shall be registered,

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

following the decision laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttarpradesh and Others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1, otherwise the petition may be closed under intimation to the petitioner.

¶19

With the above direction, this criminal original petition is closed.

¶20

sms

¶21

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶22

//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Inspector of Police
Jolarpettai Police Station
Jolarpettai, Vellore District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
+ 1 cc to Mr.G.Sankaran, Advocate Sr 31623
KR/1/7/16
Crl.OP.No.11569 of 2016

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

H.Anji v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

H.Anji v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Marimuthu Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

Kt.Muralidharan Vs the State Rep. by

M.S.Raju Vs Durga

L.S.E.Palaniappan Vs Kannan

R.Sasikumar Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Sri Lakshmi Vs the Commissioner of Police