Balu v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings but petition was withdrawn with liberty to raise points before the Trial Court. Court directed appearance at specific trial stages unless undertaking is filed.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise points before the Trial Court; petitioner directed to appear at specific trial stages on undertaking.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.06.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.O.P.No.9765 of 2016
and Crl.MP.Nos.5091 of 2016
Balu ... Petitioner/Accused 3
Vs. 1. State by The Inspector of Police, Tindivanam Police Station, Tindivanam. ... 1st Respondent/Complainant 2. V.Jothi ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records in C.C.No.57 of 2016, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tindivanam, Villupuram District, and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.Ananthanarayanan, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.M.Nandhie Devhan For Respondent [R1] : Mr.C.Emalias, Additional Public Prosecutor
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.57 of 2016, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Tindivanam, Villupuram District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Balu
- respondent
The State by The Inspector of Police, Tindivanam Police Station
- respondent
V.Jothi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court