Disposed

V.Subbulakshmi v. K.Vinaga Perumal

Madras HC26 Mar 2015TR CMP/437/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 CPC after the parties settled the disputes through mediation and executed a joint compromise memo, closing the connected petition as well.

What did the court decide?

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition was ordered in terms of the Joint Compromise Memo dated 18.12.2014; the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.

V.Subbulakshmi Vs K.Vinaga Perumal — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:26.03.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI

¶5

Tr. CMP. No. 437 of 2013
and
M.P. No. 1 of 2013
V. Subbulakshmi .. Petitioner
..vs..
K. Vinaga Perumal .. Respondents
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under
Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code with a prayer to withdraw the
HMOP No. 23 of 2013 on the file of the learned Sub Court at
Tiruchengode and transfer the same to be tried jointly with HMOP
No.51 of 2013 on the file of learned Sub Court at Kovilpatti.
For petitioner : Mr. H. Rajasekar
For Respondent : Mr.P. Valliappan
O R D E R

¶6

Both the learned counsel on record for the petitioner and the sole respondent are present.

¶7

The dispute between the parties, by order dated 08.07.2014, was referred to Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Both the parties appeared before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, along with their respective counsels and settled the issues between them on their own and the terms of settlement is reduced in writing by way of Joint Compromise Memo signed by the petitioner and the sole respondent and their respective learned counsel on record. The Joint Compromise Memo dated 18.12.2014 along with the Mediation report is received by this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent admit the factum of the compromise and the terms of compromise and the same is recorded by this Court.

¶8

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶9

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered in terms of the Joint Compromise Memo. The Joint Compromise Memo dated 18.12.2014 shall form part of the records. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶10

*Enclosed herewith xerox copy

¶11

of Mediation Agreement.

¶12

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS V )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
avr
To
1. The Subordinate Judge,
Kovilpatti.
2. The Subordinate Judge,
Tiruchengode.
+ 1 cc to Mr.P.Valliappan, Advocate SR 17386
Tr. CMP. No. 437 of 2013
and
M.P. No. 1 of 2013
sv(co)
kk 8/5

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Subbulakshmi v. K.Vinaga Perumal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Subbulakshmi v. K.Vinaga Perumal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kandasamy Gounder Vs Govindasamy Gounder (Decs)

P.Nagaraj Vs N.Kumar

D.Udyakumar Vs Gopi

A.Pavedan Vs Maragathamani

`R.Vijaya Vs K.Munusamy

Indira Gopalan Vs Commissioner, Coimbatore