Dismissed

A.Pavedan v. Maragathamani

Madras HC26 Mar 2015CRP/2950/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. The Court ordered the disposal based on a joint compromise settlement reached by the parties through the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre, recorded in a Joint Compromise Memo dated 19.12.2014.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition is ordered in terms of the Joint Compromise Memo dated 19.12.2014.

A.Pavedan Vs Maragathamani — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:26.03.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI

¶5

CRP No. 2950 of 2012

¶6

A. Pavedan 2. Smt. Thanga Tamil Selvi 3. A. Danavedan 4. Mrs. Premalatha 5. Mrs. Kodimalar 6. Mrs. Rani 7. S.K.B. Imran Ahamed ... Defendants/Petitioners Vs. 1. Maragathamani 2. Mrs. Thamarai Tamil Selvi 3. G. Nalavendan 4. G. Ashok Vendran ... Plaintiffs/Respondents

¶7

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the institution of the suit in O.S. No. 640 of 2012 on the file of the III Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶8

For petitioners : Mr. V. Raghavachari For Respondents : Mr. S. Udayakumar

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

The Power of Attorney of the petitioners 1 to 6, Mr. S.K.B. Imran Ahamed and the respondents along with their counsel on record, are present.

¶11

The dispute between the parties, by order dated 11.11.2014, was referred to Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Both the parties appeared before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, along with their respective counsels and settled the issues between them on their own and the terms of settlement is reduced in writing by way of Joint Compromise Memo signed by the Power of Attorney of the petitioners 1 to 6, the 7^th petitioner Mr. S.K.B. Imran Ahamed and the respondents and the respective learned counsel on record. The Joint Compromise Memo dated 19.12.2014 along with the Mediation report and a copy of General Power of Attorney

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

sworn by the petitioners 1 to 6 are received by this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents admit the factum of the compromise and the terms of compromise and the same is recorded by this Court.

¶14

The Civil Revision Petition is ordered in terms of the Joint Compromise Memo. The Joint Compromise Memo dated 19.12.2014 shall form part of the records.

¶15

Xerox Copy of Memo of Compromise is Enclosed herewith.

¶16

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
avr
To
The III Additional Judge,
City Civil Court,
Chennai.
Copy To
The Registrar,
City Civil Court,
Chennai.
+2cc's to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate, S.R.No.17185
CRP No. 2950 of 2012
EV(CO)
CA(08/04/2015)

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Pavedan v. Maragathamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Pavedan v. Maragathamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kandasamy Gounder Vs Govindasamy Gounder (Decs)

P.Nagaraj Vs N.Kumar

D.Udyakumar Vs Gopi

V.Subbulakshmi Vs K.Vinaga Perumal

`R.Vijaya Vs K.Munusamy

Indira Gopalan Vs Commissioner, Coimbatore