P.Nagaraj v. N.Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the court noted that the respondent produced an FIR registered as a result of the petitioner's complaint. Finding this sufficient, the court closed the contempt petition as no further order was necessary.
What did the court decide?
No further order necessary in the contempt petition; the petition is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 25.03.2015
Coram :
The Honourable Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI
CONTEMPT PETITION No.289 OF 2015 P.Nagaraj .. Petitioner Vs N.Kumar, Inspector of Police, Madharampakkam Police Station, Gummidipundi, Tiruvallur District. .. Respondent
PETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court made in
Crl.O.P.No.459 of 2014 dated 15.09.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mazhaimeni Pandian
For Respondent : Mr.D.Sivaramkumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
Both the learned counsel on record are present and are heard.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a further order is necessary after the respondent has produced a copy of the FIR based on the petitioner's complaint.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Nagaraj
- respondent
N. Kumar
Coram
K.B.K. Vasuki
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court