Petitioner sought direction to register a case and investigate under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Court directed the second respondent to conduct an inquiry in pending C.S.R.No.318 of 2015 following Lalita Kumari guidelines, then closed the petition.
Direction to the second respondent to conduct inquiry in C.S.R.No.318 of 2015 and act accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 06.07.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.OP No.16643 of 2015
N.Rajagopal .. Petitioner
Vs
State rep.by 1.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Egmore, Vepery, Chennai - 7.
2.The Inspector of Police, Chrompet Police Station, Chennai. .. Respondents
Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register a case on the basis of complaint dated 28.06.2015 on the file of the respondent herein and investigate the same and file a final report within the time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
For Petitioner :Mr.S.Rajanikanth For Respondents :Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed praying to direct the respondents to register a case against the petitioner's complaint dated 28.06.2015, investigate the same and file a final report within the time frame fixed by this Court.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub Assistant Registrar
ds
To
1.The Commissioner of Police,
Greater Chennai,
Egmore, Vepery,
Chennai - 7.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Chrompet Police Station,
Chennai.
3. The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Madras.
1 cc to Mr.S.Rajanikanth, Advocate Sr.No.33739
Crl.OP No.16643 of 2015
lrs(Co)
pmk.15.7.2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to register a case, conduct enquiry and file a report under Section 482 Cr.P.C. based on the petitioner's complaint.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & othersExplained¶15
Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)]
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Rajagopal
The State by the Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai
The Inspector of Police, Chrompet Police Station, Chennai
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
