Court directed police to conduct expeditious enquiry and register a case if a cognizable offence is made out, relying on Lalita Kumari.
Direction to conduct expeditious enquiry and register case if cognizable offence made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 03.07.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.OP.No.16388 of 2015
V.Thayammal ... Petitioner
Vs
1.The Sub Inspector of Police,
Kariyalur Police Station,
Katchirapalayam Police Circle,
Chinna Salem Taluk,
Villupuram District.
2.T.Palani
3.L.Thirumalai
4.T.Raman
5.T.Muthusamy
6.P.Gandhi ... Respondents
Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the 1st respondent to take legal action against the respondents 2 to 6 after register the case in accordance with law on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 05.06.2015 vide CSR No.15 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015 on the file of the 1st respondent.
For Petitioner :Mr.Dalit Tiger C.Ponnusamy
For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
Seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to take legal action against the respondents 2 to 6 after register the case in accordance with law on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 05.06.2015 vide CSR No.15 of 2015 dated 12.06.2015 on the file of the 1st respondent, the petitioner has come up with this petition.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the 1st respondent and perused the material placed on record.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the petition enquiry is pending in CSR.No.15 of 2015 before the 1st respondent.
4.Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the 1st respondent police is directed to conduct enquiry expeditiously and during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, a regular case shall be registered, following the decision laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttarpradesh and Others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1.
With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.
mps
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Sub Inspector of Police,
Kariyalur Police Station,
Katchirapalayam Police Circle,
Chinna Salem Taluk,
Villupuram District.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Chennai.
+ 1 cc to Mr.Dalit Tiger C.Ponnusamy, Advocate SR 33141
scd(co)
prk13/7
Crl.OP.No.16388 of 2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police should be directed to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint in accordance with established judicial precedent.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and OthersExplained¶17
Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others (2014) 2 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Thayammal
The Sub Inspector of Police
T. Palani
L. Thirumalai
T. Raman
T. Muthusamy
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
P.N. Prakash
Parties & counsel
