Disposed

K.Sundari Kannan v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC6 Jul 2015CRL OP/10615/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a direction under CrPC 482 to file a final report in Crime No.1122 of 2012. The police submitted the diary was missed but reconstructed it. The court granted a four-week extension for investigation and final report filing before discharging the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete investigation within four weeks and file final report before Magistrate.

K.Sundari Kannan Vs the State Rep. by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 06.07.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.OP.No.10615 of 2015

K.Sundari Kannan

... Petitioner

The State rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police, V4, Rajamangalam Police Station, Villivakkam,

¶10

Chennai-600 049.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondent to file final report in Crime No.1122 of 2012 dated 24.10.2010 within a stipulated period.

¶13

For Petitioner :Mr.G.Appavu For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶14

Seeking a direction to the respondent to file final report in Crime No.1122 of 2012 dated 24.10.2010, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent and perused the material placed on record.

¶16

3.Today, Mr.R.Arnold Easther, Inspector of Police, V4 Rajamangalam Police Station, Villivakkam, Chennai, is present before this Court. It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions from the respondent Police that the case diary was missed and now, it has been reconstructed and that if four weeks time is granted, the investigation would be completed and final report would be filed before the concerned Court.

¶17

4.Recording the submission, the respondent police are directed to complete the investigation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file final report before the concerned Magistrate.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶20

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CO)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
mps
To
1.The Sub Inspector of Police,
V4, Rajamangalam Police Station,
Villivakkam,
Chennai-600 049.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Chennai.
1 cc to M/s. G. Appavu, Advocate, sr. 34221
Crl.OP.No.10615 of 2015
MP (CO)
kk 21/7

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Sundari Kannan v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Sundari Kannan v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Thayammal Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Mr.Srinivasan Vs State Rep. by

R.Baskaran Vs Ramadoss

P.Parameswaran Vs State Rep. by

N.Rajagopal Vs State Rep. by

A.M.Giri Vs State Rep. by