Disposed

K. Anupriya, v. the Branch Manager

Madras HC6 Aug 2014WP(MD)/11262/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court directed the respondent Bank to issue an application form and consider the petitioner's representation for an educational loan within three weeks. The Court clarified that this direction does not mandate the granting of the loan.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent Bank to issue an application form and consider the petitioner's claim for an educational loan within three weeks.

K. Anupriya, Vs the Branch Manager — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 06.08.2014

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

¶6

W.P.(MD) No.11262 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014

¶7

K.Anupriya ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Branch Manager Indian Overseas Bank Saliyamangalam Branch Babanasam Taluk Thanjavur District ... Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and grant the educational loan to continue her studies in B.Sc. (Nursing) Course for the years 2012-2016 at St.Mary's Institute of Nursing, Bangalore.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.Veera Kathiravan

¶12

The petitioner seeks for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent Bank to sanction educational loan to the petitioner to enable her to pursue B.Sc. (Nursing) Course, for the year 2012-2016, at St.Mary's Institute of Nursing, Bangalore.

¶13

According to the petitioner, she hails from a family, which is living below poverty line and she is unable to pay the fees for undergoing the Course and the respondent Bank is not even issuing application form for grant of educational loan and therefore the petitioner has approached this Court by filing this writ petition.

¶14

In the light of the above stand, without going into the merits of the petitioner's claim, there will be a direction to the respondent Bank to consider the petitioner's claim and issue application form to the petitioner for the purpose of availing educational loan, within a period of three weeks from the date on which the petitioner or her parents approach the respondent Bank. On furnishing such application, the petitioner shall duly fill up and submit the same to the respondent Bank and on receipt of such application form, the respondent Bank shall consider the same in accordance with the Scheme. It is made clear that mere issuance of application form should not be misunderstood that this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court has directed to grant educational loan, which shall be done by the respondent Bank in accordance with the Scheme

¶15

¶16

With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar (Crl.side)

¶18

/True copy/

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

To: The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Saliyamangalam Branch, Babanasam Taluk, Thanjavur District. +1cc to MR.VEERAKATHIRAVAN, ADVOCATE IN SR : 43734

¶21

Krk SR : 21.08.2014 : 2p/3c

¶22

W.P.(MD) No.11262 of 2014 06.08.2014 (2/5

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K. Anupriya, v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Anupriya, v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.P. Rathinasamy Nadar, Vs the District Collector

Sundaram, Vs the Superintendent Engineer

Syed Meera Vs the State of Tamilnadu

V.Swaminathan, Vs the Superintending Engineer

M.Divya, D/O M. Marimuthu, Vs the Branch Manager

K. Ghanaselvam Vs the Branch Manager