Allowed

Duraipandi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Oct 2014CRL OP(MD)/18418/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners who faced arrest for alleged offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 355, 506(i) IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act. Conditions imposed included daily police appearance and executing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail to be released on arrest with conditions including daily police appearance and execution of bond.

Duraipandi Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Eighth day of October Two Thousand Fourteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.18418 of 2014

¶6

1 DURAIPANDI

¶7

2 MUTHUKARUPPI @ PERIYAKARUPPI 3 SARATHKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED A1 TO A3

¶8

Vs THE STATE REP.BY

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, APPANTHIRUPPATHI POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

¶10

CRIME NO.1027 OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶11

For Petitioner : M/S.M.LINGADURAI Advocate

¶12

For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶14

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶15

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A3, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b) 323, 355 and 506(i) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.1027 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and a false case has been foisted against them. He further submitted that A1 and A2 were arrested and released on bail.

¶17

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital.

¶18

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured had already been discharged https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

¶19

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶20

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶22

¶23

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI.

¶24

2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

¶25

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, APPANTHIRUPPATHI POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

¶26

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶27

+1. CC to M/S.M.LINGADURAI Advocate SR.No.55642.

¶28

CRL OP(MD) No.18418 of 2014

¶29

msm 08.10.2014 p2/6c

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Duraipandi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Duraipandi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Vinoth Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Sasikumar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Jose Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Arikandan @ Kannan @ Jim Vs the Inspector of Police

Lakshmi Vs the Sub Inspector of Police