Allowed

Lakshmi v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Oct 2014CRL OP(MD)/18389/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowing a petition for anticipatory bail filed by five accused persons fearing arrest for offences under IPC and Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, the court granted bail subject to appearing before police daily and executing a bond.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest upon executing a bond and complying with appearance conditions.

Lakshmi Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Eighth day of October Two Thousand Fourteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.18389 of 2014

1 LAKSHMI 2 SATHYA

3 BABU

4 PITCHAI

5 SARAVANAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED

¶10

STATE REP BY

¶11

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUPPAYURANI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.434/2014 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

¶12

For Petitioner : M/S.A.JEYARAM Advocate

¶13

For Respondent : M/S.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., r/w. Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.434 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence and a false case has been foisted against them. He further submitted that A2 and A4 were arrested and released on bail.

¶18

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital.

¶19

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶22

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

08/10/2014

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

¶28

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II MADURAI

¶29

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT

¶30

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶31

4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARUPPAYURANI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT

¶32

+One cc to M/S.A.JEYARAM, ADVOCATE, SR.NO.55643 RL/6 C- 13/10/2014

¶33

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.18389 of 2014 Date :08/10/2014

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Lakshmi v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshmi v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Vinoth Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Sasikumar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Jose Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Arikandan @ Kannan @ Jim Vs the Inspector of Police

Duraipandi Vs the Inspector of Police