Antony Raj v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Petition was dismissed as it was withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand Fourteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM
CRL OP(MD) No.17964 of 2014
ANTONY RAJ ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NORTH POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN, CRIME NO.516/2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.ANGAPPAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR.KANNITHEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/-
14/10/2014
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,NORTH POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN
2 THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI
ORDER
IN
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ CRL OP(MD) No.17964 of 2014 Date :14/10/2014 AA/17.10.2014/1p-4c/
ANTONY RAJ
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NORTH POLICE STATION TUTICORIN
G. CHOCKALINGAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court