Allowed

K.Vasanth v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Sept 2014CRL OP(MD)/16065/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three petitioners alleged to have committed murder and offences under IPC sections 302, 147, and 148 sought bail under Section 439 CrPC. After noting they were in custody for over 87 days, investigation was complete, and co-accused were on bail, the court enlarged them on bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, on condition of daily appearance before the police at 10.00 a.m.

K.Vasanth Vs the Inspector of Police — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Madras HC (2014)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Eighth day of September Two Thousand Fourteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.16065 of 2014

¶6

1 K.VASANTH 2 B.VANEESH 3 K.MUTHU @ MUTHUKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.AQ, A2 AND A4

¶7

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BOOTHPANDY POLICE STAITON, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUAMRI DISTRICT.

¶8

CR. NO. 296 OF 2014. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARASAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners are A1, A2 and A4 and they were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 16.06.2014, for the alleged offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 341, 294(B), 302 r/w 120(B) of IPC, in Crime No.296 of 2014 on the file of the respondent and hence, seek bail.

¶14

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 18.05.2014, the deceased is said to have attacked A2 and A4, for which a case has been registered against the deceased. Due to which, on 16.06.2014, the accused have attacked the deceased with lethal weapons and caused his death.

¶15

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners have been incarceration for more than 87 days and in this case, investigation is over.

¶16

4.It is further submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the co-accused were granted bail in Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.15365 and 14241 of 2014.

¶17

5.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that the respondent have almost completed the investigation and they have to file the charge sheet.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail with certain conditions.

¶19

7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandy, Kanyakumari District and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

¶20

/ TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

¶23

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE BOOTHAPANDY, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶24

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 4.THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, NAGERCOIL AT KANYAKUMARI. 5.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BOOTHPANDY POLICE STAITON, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUAMRI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate SR.No.50676 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16065 of 2014 Date :08/09/2014 RG.09.09.2014 2P.7C.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Vasanth v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Vasanth v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.Selvam Vs the Inspector of Police

Mr. Jefferson Pon David Vs the Inspector of Police

Jayanthi Vs the Inspector of Police

V.Veluchamy Nadar Vs the Inspector of Police

V.Thirunavukkarasu Vs the Inspector of Police

Abbas Ali Vs the Inspector of Police