The petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as having been withdrawn by the petitioner. No legal principle is laid down.
The petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Eighth day of September Two Thousand Fourteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRL OP(MD) No.15206 of 2014
V.THIRUNAVUKKARASU ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED-8
Vs
STATE REP BY ITS
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE E.O.W.II KARUR DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 1 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.ANBARASAN,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, this Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/08/09/2014 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE E.O.W.II KARUR DISTRICT. RL/3 C- 11/9/2014
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.15206 of 2014 Date :08/09/2014
V. Thirunavukkarasu
State Rep by its The Inspector of Police E.O.W.II Karur District
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
